2 Comments

Getting that sort of nuance in a movie is really difficult.

I remember watching the first X-Men move. I was in college, but home on vacation, I saw it with an old friend who was a big comics fan and a particular fan of the X-men. We had a great time and both agreed it was the first movie to capture the _feel_ of comics on the big screen.

And yet . . .

It gets the character of Scott Summers badly wrong -- and he's a tough character for some of the same reasons that make Doom complicated. He's the senior X-man, and can be a bit of a prig, and sometimes overly invested in his authority. But he's invested because he has no life outside the X-men. Both because the group is his surrogate family and because he constantly fears that he's not _capable_ of life outside the X-men. That his powers will be accidentally destructive.

The movie captures none of that and doesn't even try -- there isn't space for that sort of emotion within the 2 hours of a movie.

I appreciate your description of Doom, and I would love to see a movie attempt to do him justice, but I've become convinced that many of the strengths of comic books don't translate well to movies -- and that weight of character history is one of them.

Expand full comment